In order to prevent and protect the manufacturers and vendors of OPC UA Safety products from possibly misleading understandings or wrong expectations and gross negligence actions regarding safety-related developments and applications, the following items must be observed and explained in each training, seminar, workshop and consultancy.

  1. A device will not be automatically applicable for safety-related applications just by implementing OPC UA Safety.
  2. In contrast, appropriate development processes according to safety standards must be observed for safety-related products (see IEC 61508, IEC 61511, IEC 602041, IEC 62061, and ISO 13849) and/or an assessment from a notified assessment body is required.
  3. The manufacturer of a safety product is responsible for the correct implementation of this specification, as well as the correctness and completeness of the product documentation and information.
  4. Additional important information including corrigenda and errata published by the OPC Foundation and/or PI must be considered for implementation and assessment.
  5. The OPC UA Safety test specification describes the test cases which are necessary to test the behavior of a SafetyAutomationComponent as described in this document. These tests – or a set of (automated or manual) tests that has been shown to test the behavior in an equivalent way - must be successfully run at a test laboratory accredited by the OPC Foundation or PI. For details on the testing and certification processes, please consult the OPC Test Lab Specification (OPC 10010, all parts). For a possible architecture of an automated way to perform the test cases, see 12.3. Note that this verification step does not substitute the other methods of assessment that are mentioned in this document.

As a rule, the international safety standards are accepted (ratified) globally. However, since safety technology in automation is relevant to occupational safety and the concomitant insurance risks in a country, recognition of the rules pointed out here is still a sovereign right. The national “Authorities” (notified bodies) decide on the recognition of assessment reports.

NOTE Examples of such “Authorities” are the IFA (Institut für Arbeitsschutz der Deutschen Gesetzlichen Unfallversicherung / Institute for Occupational Safety and Health of the German Social Accident Insurance) in Germany, HSE (Health and Safety Executive) in UK, FM (Factory Mutual / Property Insurance and Risk Management Organization), UL (Underwriters Laboratories Inc. / Product Safety Testing and Certification Organization), or the INRS (Institut National de Recherche et de Sécurité) in France.

For details, see the OPC UA Safety test specification.

The OPC Foundation will publish an automated test tool, the OPC UA Safety Compliance Test Tool (UASCTT), which implements the test cases that are described in the OPC UA Safety test specification using the test principles described in this Clause. The UASCTT will be approved by a Notified Body. It is recommended to use the UASCTT to perform the test cases as described in Clause 12.1, item 5.

An exemplary test principle for OPC UA Safety is presented. The OPC UA Safety test is a fully automated verification based on test patterns covering all paths of the OPC UA Safety state machines. Different types of possible correct and incorrect SPDUs, parameters, and interactions with the upper interface of the SafetyProvider / SafetyConsumer are taken into account. These test patterns together with the expected responses/stimulations are stored as an XML document and imported into the test tool software. The test tool executes the complete test patterns while connected to the OPC UA Safety layer under test, compares the nominal with the actual reactions and is recording the results that can be printed out for the test report.

Figure 28 shows the structure of the layer tester for the SafetyProvider and SafetyConsumer.


Figure 28 – Automated SafetyProvider / SafetyConsumer test

The SafetyProvider / SafetyConsumer tester acts like an opposite SafetyProvider / SafetyConsumer Layer to stimulate the tested SafetyProvider / SafetyConsumer so that all possible states and transitions in the respective state machine are being exercised. Thus, it must be configured according to the deployed OPC UA communication system. This can be done with the help of an XML file associated with the tester.

A so-called “upper tester” runs on top of the SafetyProvider or SafetyConsumer within the device under test (DUT). It transfers data from the SafetyProvider or SafetyConsumer via its SAPI and makes them visible to the test tool via an OPC UA interface that is specified in the OPC UA Safety test specification (“Set Data” in Figure 29 and Figure 30). In a similar way, the upper tester enables the test-tool to set inputs of the SAPI (“Get Data” in Figure 29 and Figure 30).

The upper tester is implemented by the vendor of the DUT using standard program languages such as C/C++, IEC 61131-3 or Structured Text and does not need to be executed in a safety-related way.

Detailed requirements for the upper tester are described in the OPC UA Safety test specification.


Figure 29 – “Upper Tester” within the SafetyProvider


Figure 30 – “Upper Tester” within the SafetyConsumer